| ||||||||||||||
As you might imagine, the editorial piece on Total Information Awareness brought tons of mail. It was a pretty mixed bag, and while most readers expressed concern about the TIA strategy, that opinion was by no means unanimous. From Ruben Ortiz
Thanks for the clear and concise articles regularly included in the Penguin Shell. However, I object to the follow passage from the issue regarding the TIA project: From Hyrum Luke Mills
While I don't think you are at all out of line with regard to the capabilities of the database system you spoke of, I think you would do well to analyze how we got in our current homeland security situation in the first place. There is entirely too much information out there for the government to look at _any_ individual in a sufficient level of detail to warrant concern. We cannot process the information we have about known enemies, let alone suspected ones. While I think that the project deserves extremely scrutinous oversight, I also think it should go forward. There is much to learn about computer technology from this type of large-scale project, even if the project itself fails (which I think it will.) From Thomas Torpey
I too share the concerns that have been expressed over the TIA. On a deeper level however, both the danger and the promise are far greater than may appear at first blush. If one begins to try to imagine the singular machine that will result from this effort as a demonstration of technology the promise emerges. The stated goals of this agency are noble and right. The fear comes with the expectation of the abuse of the resultant power. No technology can be rightly called good or evil in and of itself. Consider the internet itself, while it has created lines of communication and information sharing that has never existed before, and through this insured a higher level of freedom for all (consider Linux), those very same channels are used to transmit hate, perversion and lie more than ever possible before. A centralized information system that is, at least in a sense, self-aware is of inestimable value in the effort to insure the stable and efficient management of society. Instant language translation in real time is beyond valuable. Imagine that at some point in the future this system is able to predict the probability of events in the near future and that it predicts that there is a high probability of a traffic accident at a particular intersection involving a school bus and a car driven by a man who is under great stress and has just lost his job (the system would know this) and alters the traffic patterns to avoid the accident. This would involve the biometrics (stress levels) real time data and situational information and universal system access. The likelihood is that humans wouldn't even see the data until it becomes a situation as there would be far to great a volume for any one to be aware of. "It" is not the threat, we are. For years I've watched as science fiction has predicted reality in the oddest ways. Remember the first Flip Phone& from Motorola? Does anyone not think that the Star Trek communicator inspired it? It looks like the matrix is being developed in order to care for us, protect us, and keep us safe. That is the threat, our need, our demand, for molly coddling. Just one mans opinion. From Gordon Martin
Mark Day asked "where do you draw the line between safety and privacy". None of the things being done under TIA make anything safer and I believe Benjamin Franklin said it best when he said "Those willing to give up freedom for security will neither get nor deserve either". Everything done in the name of security thus far only gives the illusion of security, especially the procedures implemented at airports. When all passengers are treated as criminals and have everything removed which would enable them to not be a victim, it only makes it more dangerous, but gives the illusion of safety and a "feel good" sense of security. From Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
It is true that much of what TIA is looking to track is already being tracked, but not as one single database by one entity empowered with immunity. Of course, we've completed a couple of distro reviews since the last DIY Friday. There were many comments about those distros, but the largest number addressed Mandrake. From Dave Shemchak A thought about the boot disk creation, or lack of, in Mandrake 9.0. I am a newbie to Linux so this may be out in left field. I started with Mandrake (and Linux) in general a couple of months ago. At the time I didn't have a DSL connection so I downloaded directory after directory of files off the nearest ftp site - after about a week of nearly 24hr straight downloading I had Mandrake 8.x on the hard drive. Because I didn't have the CD images I made an install floppy and (after many attempts and plenty of colorful language) I had Mandrake on my second hard drive. At the appropriate time during the installation, it created a boot disk. From Shawn Jefferds
I've tried making the move away from the dark side and tried several different distros of Linux over the last two or so years. Each time I gave up after being frustrated, upset to have to return to Micro$oft products. I have a new laptop my company supplied and it has Win2K and I have to admit I really like it. Today's GnomeTWEAK, GnomeCORE and (as always) GnomeVOICE sections are written by you, as well. Though the comments don't all address topics covered in their respective sections, I've tried to break them out into the section that suits the comments best. Answer a few questions if you can. Take the answers you need, And, as always, thanks for the input. Have a great weekend.
Readers' Tweaks Package Management From Shiva
I've been using linux for a while now - trying out various distros,and finally sticking on to Mandrake 9. All the ones I have tried so far have the RPM Package Management System - which is overall quite comfortable, though the dependencies still drive me crazy sometimes!! I heard that the Debian Package Management System was much better at handling dependencies - though I have frankly been a little perturbed about Debian having the reputation of being very hard to install(i.e. you have to be a linux guru to install it!!). Slackware doesn't have any Package Management System as such ,does it - just tarballs, right ? Was wondering if you could cover this aspect as part of your Slackware review ? Firewalls From Tony McCallie
Tony, I really appreciate the series on firewalls. Great choice! Before I knew about the Firewall specific distros, I found a great Webmin module for firewalls called Turtle Firewall. I know Webmin comes with its own firewall module, but I found Turtle Firewall to be much easier for a newbie. Both are based on IPTables. I'm currently running RH7.3 on an old 233Mhz with 40Mb ram and it makes a great firewall for my home office. From Richard Garrow
Well you are doing a great job on the Gnome Firewall Tweak. I do have a question or a point to make concerning your suggestion on using SmoothWall. I downloaded the program and ran it up with out any problems as you said we would. I then when in and had a look at the Scripts that the firewall was using. Here comes the question are you aware that Smoothwall 1.0 is still using IPChains and not IPTables?? I was surprised and then again I know that IPChains has been around quite a while and it has proven itself in the field. So I guess the old saying comes into play here if it not broken then do not try and fix it. From Dan Welshans
I have been using a derivative of Smoothwall for the past year. IPCop put out by some of the programmers who originally produced Smoothwall. They decided that Smoothwall Limited had some anti-open source views and created a "new"firewall utility from Smoothwall source. IPCop is a slightly updated version of Smoothwall 0.9.9.Ithas the identical web-based configuration utility, which I find handy. They have promised a new version that will use the 2.4 kernel and have a ton of new features. Too bad they have not released any updates lately. I hope that they have not lost interest in this project. From Gael Duval
Tony: From Steve Cody
Having recently managed to put together a firewall so that the kids can share the shiny new cable connection, I have a few comments to make about using an "old PC".
Recommend It!
Background Processes From Marcel de Jong
I believe that there is a small error in the GnomeTweak of 23.12.2002 From Matthew Thull
Long time reader, first time writer. nmap From Chris Berry
I just thought you should know that nmap is available for windows too. We have a mixed Mandrake 8.2 and win2k environment, and it works well on both for us. From Eric Fortin
Maybe it has already been pointed out to you, but just in case: There's a Windows port of nmap and it seems to have the same functionality as the Linux version. Great tool! Network Configuration From Ernest Wilcox
Just a small note: devfs From Gary Greene
In concerns about devfs, Mandrake has used it by default since 8.0 However, the /dev mount point isn't empty when the system mounts the devfs. This is so in case the system has any difficulties with devfsd (the little daemon that creates the backwards compatible symlinks.) gzexe From Andrew Molyneux
I noticed your recommendation of gzexe in Penguin Shell 2002-12-13. You might want to point your readers at UPX (upx.sourceforge.net). It can also compress DOS, Windows and Atari TOS executables, to name just a few. It's free, and it's the best EXE packer I've ever seen, including several commercial products.
Recommend It!
MicroBSD 0.6RC2 http://www.microbsd.net/modules/news/ "MicroBSD is a hardened, secure, and small OS for x86/Alpha/Sun/PPC (or other) platforms. It uses as little hard disk space as possible, while providing a fully-functional system. It includes services for firewalling, intrusion detection, VPN, SMTP, WWW, DNS, FTP, and others, and features POSIX 1e Audit Controls and logging, mandatory access controls, filesystem level ACLs, application stack hardening and protection, modular design, easy installation via FTP, CD-ROM, or floppy disk, and much more."
Recommend It!
dd'ing "Here at work we use dd to create disk images. One of our products uses Xenix, a Microsoft Unix that was discontinued in the early 90's. Windows can't read a Xenix diskette, so we use a Linux box to maintain the disk images. Just slap the source floppy in the drive and type 'dd if=/dev/fd0 of=~/dsk_img_01' and you've got a nice disk image. To create a new floppy from that image, reverse the commands: 'dd if=~/dsk_img_01 of=/dev/fd0'. "I've also used this technique when running VMware on Linux, because it had some issues writing to the floppy. Create an image of a floppy using dd, mount it as a drive in VMware, write whatever I need to transfer to it, unmount, dd the image to the floppy and sneaker net it wherever it needs to go."
Recommend It!
Linux International "Linux International is a non-profit organization, residing physically in the United States. Our organization is made up of many people contributing from all areas of the globe. We distribute information about Linux, and how it will benefit business and personal users, reserve places at major computer expos, and accept donations to distribute to programmers who need money to test out applications."
Recommend It!
|
Get Our Help Files New PC Tips Book
Latest Windows Daily
Suggest a Feature
Link To Lockergnome
Ask a Question
General Feedback
Easy Web Editor Dr.Tag - MP3 Tagger Protect Your Passwords Easy Slide Show Maker Create CD, Web, catalog Outpost Firewall Pro Pretty Good MahJongg Book Collector Manage Your Workgroup Form Pilot FirstStop WebSearch Boomer - Stream Now Question: which group is 250,000+ strong and always looking for stuff to make their personal and professional lives run smoother?
©2002, Lockergnome LLC. ISSN: 1095-3965. All Rights Reserved. Please read our Terms of Service. Our Web site is hosted by DigitalDaze. Domain registered at DNS Central. Powered by Lyris ListManager | |||||||||||||